A Superdance and a Superbowl
By Susan Gerhard
SF360.org introduces a weekly log: blogs, print, webmags, and a few other items of interest…
In the week that follows the Sundance Film Festival, two things arrive with regularity: Articles about how the festival has succumbed to (or advanced toward) commercialism, and previews for the Superbowl, America’s premier commercial entertainment event. Though I heard many rumors of at least one Bay Area football star roaming the festival and did watch a playoff game on Main Street, there was another reason football comes to mind as the best metaphor for Sundance ’07: It felt more like an NFL draft than any other year. And I mean that in the best of ways — independent films of unknown future potential commanded massive sums from suits seeking franchise gold. It was, as Anne Thompson noted in The Hollywood Reporter Jan. 26th, the biggest seller’s market of all time. “Thirteen movies — 10 features and three documentaries — sold to distributors, both foreign and domestic, over six days, with many more smaller deals expected to close at festival’s end and beyond.”
What, with Sundance hit “Little Miss Sunshine” headed into the swimsuit competition phase of the Oscars, it was no small wonder that buyers were eager to swallow many next big things and obscure the beauty of small films outside the competition roster. Manohla Dargis raised her complaint to the level of poetry with her NY Times closer: “Independence is a boom market. It’s a lifestyle choice, a state of mind, a backward baseball cap, a magazine feature, an Oscar hopeful, a mirage, a nostalgia trip. Each January it is a collective fantasy that even a doubter like me finds hard to resist because every so often a film cuts through the noise to hit you smack in the solar plexus.”
Over at Movie City News, Ray Pride found that film in “Once,” a film he admits he saw twice. Everyone else is talking about a love between horses and humans that, unbelievably, did dare speak its name, as the SF Chron’s Leah Garchik notes with a nod to the Film Arts Foundation’s blogger Eric Henry — who somehow found a way to “act like an adult” while paying witness to the pic.
“Psycho” and psychology
While we’re shining light on the after effects of “Sunshine’s” Oscar nom at Sundance and for the multiplex, Lincoln Spector at Bayflicks offers this bit of sense to the Oscar discourse: “The Motion Picture Academy doesn’t have a single mind to think with. It contains hundreds of minds, of various levels of brightness, that choose who to vote for under the influence of sentiment, personal friendships, exposure to heavy advertising, and, odd as this may seem, what movies they actually liked. Margins of victory are top secret, but I doubt that anything like a consensus is common.” Then he gets to picks for the week, always rated, and geographically diverse, including “Psycho” at the Cerrito. See you there.
01.31.2007